<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Op/Ed Page</title>
	<link>http://opinions.promotetheprogress.com</link>
	<description>My personal barrel of ink</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Dissemination&#8217;s the thing by J. Matthew Buchanan</title>
		<link>http://opinions.promotetheprogress.com/disseminations-the-thing/4/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Matthew Buchanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opinions.promotetheprogress.com/disseminations-the-thing/4/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Amit -

I agree wholeheartedly.  The problems the Office is no doubt dealing with (server load, etc.) could certainly have been dealt with better, i.e., in a way that doesn't hamper the dissemination of information.

The icing on the cake is the lack of notice....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amit -</p>
<p>I agree wholeheartedly.  The problems the Office is no doubt dealing with (server load, etc.) could certainly have been dealt with better, i.e., in a way that doesn&#8217;t hamper the dissemination of information.</p>
<p>The icing on the cake is the lack of notice&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dissemination&#8217;s the thing by Amit Goyal</title>
		<link>http://opinions.promotetheprogress.com/disseminations-the-thing/4/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Goyal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opinions.promotetheprogress.com/disseminations-the-thing/4/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I think the USPTO has taken a backward step including the human test through reCAPTCHA on the PAIR. 

I think they could have made it more easily accessible through some additional cost, as the EPO does through the OPS.

This step will just hamper the dissemination of information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the USPTO has taken a backward step including the human test through reCAPTCHA on the PAIR. </p>
<p>I think they could have made it more easily accessible through some additional cost, as the EPO does through the OPS.</p>
<p>This step will just hamper the dissemination of information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dissemination&#8217;s the thing by The Invent Blog® &#187; One bad apple&#8230;all practitioners suffer (The USPTO and Easy Access to Public Data) :: The Patent Blog of Stephen M. Nipper</title>
		<link>http://opinions.promotetheprogress.com/disseminations-the-thing/4/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>The Invent Blog® &#187; One bad apple&#8230;all practitioners suffer (The USPTO and Easy Access to Public Data) :: The Patent Blog of Stephen M. Nipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opinions.promotetheprogress.com/disseminations-the-thing/4/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] page on his blog where he speaks his peace.&#160; For instance, in his latest post he tackles the USPTO&#8217;s recent incidents of limiting (or at least making less accessible) public data.&#160; Another example is the addition of the verification code in Public [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] page on his blog where he speaks his peace.&nbsp; For instance, in his latest post he tackles the USPTO&#8217;s recent incidents of limiting (or at least making less accessible) public data.&nbsp; Another example is the addition of the verification code in Public [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
